Dr. Halliday Sutherland

"Dr. Halliday Sutherland is a born writer, especially a born story-teller. Dr. Sutherland, who is distinguished in medicine, is an amateur in the sense that he only writes when he has nothing better to do. But when he does, it could hardly be done better” – G.K. Chesterton

Secret admirers

rqZBrx1WRsCtkqGSVBK6_IMG_0063

It is interesting to note that some contemporary writers about Marie Stopes sometimes signal that they are disturbed by her eugenic beliefs. For example:

I have no doubt that these authors sincerely abhor eugenics, but their statements beg these questions:

Troubling—to whom?

Uncomfortable—for whom?

Deplored—by whom?

Given that Stopes’ interest in eugenics was “unapologetic,” [1] we can assume that she was neither troubled nor discomfited by, nor deplored her own beliefs. This leaves only the authors and their readers as the afflicted persons.

These authors probably do not realise that their statements indicate a close emotional kinship with Dr. Halliday Sutherland. After all, these same emotions impelled him to oppose the eugenic statements of Pearson in 1912 (The Seed and the Soil in Tuberculosis), of Stopes in 1922 (Birth Control) and of Darwin in 1936 (Laws of Life).

That is where the similarity ends, because for Sutherland there were two differences. Firstly, denouncing Edwardian class-based eugenics today is to swim with the current. In his time, it was to swim against it, and to oppose the most influential and powerful persons of that era: Ellis, Galton, Huxley, Keynes, Pearson, Russell, Shaw, Stopes, Webb, Webb and Wells.

Secondly, Sutherland did not have the historical hindsight of Nazi crimes to guide him.

Are these authors perhaps his secret, albeit unconscious, admirers?  If ever I do get around to setting up the Halliday Sutherland Appreciation Society, these authors will be invited to join the “secret admirers” chapter and will receive a free t-shirt that proclaims:

I admire Halliday Sutherland—I just don’t realise it

Notes

[1] Cohen, D., 1996. Marie Stopes and the Mothers’ Clinics.  Page 78. London, The Galton Institute.

Post-script

You can read the article which rebuts Tom Nash’s The Trials of Marie Stopes here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on 1 June 2016 by in Eugenics, Opposition to eugenics, Stopes v Sutherland, Tuberculosis.

Get updates on the adventures of Halliday Sutherland straight to your inbox.

Join 31 other followers

Centenary of the Stopes v. Sutherland libel trial

February 21st, 2023
5.2 years to go.